A review by the ministry last year revealed that the zones had missed their export targets and investments were only half of the originally estimated Rs 1,700 crore. |
|
Under the original AEZ policy, 25 per cent of the development cost was to be borne by the central government and 25 per cent by the state government, while the remaining 50 per cent of investment was the responsibility of anchor investors (private companies) that were to set up bases in the zones. |
|
The zones are set up in agro-climatic regions that are known for a particular variety of farm produce. The infrastructure in the area, which included roads, storage, transport and other facilities, was to be developed by combining central and state schemes. |
|
Perhaps the main reason for their failure is that agri zones do not get tax sops of the kind that SEZs enjoy. “The basic reason why AEZs did not kick off as planned was that no anchor investor was interested in them. These four zones which we are promoting will serve as an example for prospective investors,” said a commerce ministry official. |
|
The official added that though some investments were starting to trickle in, they were not enough to serve the objectives of the policy. |
|
“Over and above that, a lot of agri zones were announced by state governments without giving a thought to the fact that private players needed to be involved in their development.” |
|
No comments:
Post a Comment